🔗 Share this article

A Denmark-based man has been convicted of sharing nude segments from protected films and television shows on the social media site Reddit.

According to a law enforcement report obtained by BBC News, the unnamed individual posted 347 clips of nude scenes in a subreddit he managed, which were then viewed 4.2 million times.

Danish authorities confirm he has been given a 7-month suspended sentence for violating copyright laws.

Experts explain the defendant was prosecuted under a rarely-used provision in Danish intellectual property legislation, with the judge ruling that by taking the scenes out of their original context, the man had damaged the performers' "moral rights".

He has additionally been convicted of sharing more than 25 terabytes of protected digital content.

From spring 2022 to May 2023, the man known as "KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted sexually explicit scenes featuring over 100 female performers.

He distributed them in the forum he was a administrator of.

Per the Denmark's copyright protection group The Rights Alliance (TRA), his online community had more than 6,000 members and participants were prompted to ask for excerpts of particular actors.

In 2023, advocates filed the incident to the police on behalf of the affected artists, filmmakers and production companies, which resulted in the subreddit being shut down.

Andrea Vagn Jensen, among the actresses whose nude scenes were circulated in the group, told Danish media at the period she believed there was a distinction between being seen unclothed in a movie and appearing on Reddit.

The performer said the uploads amounted to "exploitation".

'An important message'

The defendant was detained in fall 2024 and admitted guilty to the allegations last month.

In a comment after the ruling, the head of the Rights Alliance the organization's leader remarked the decision sent an "significant" message "that violations of artists' rights has consequences".

The verdict is viewed as unprecedented in the country for its use of the "moral rights" section of the Danish Copyright Act, which states an artist's work cannot be utilized in a way which violates their standing.

Intellectual property specialist a legal scholar told the media the legal matter was "rare" for its emphasis on the damage to the dignity of an artist, rather than to them financially.

How the case could influence nations abroad is uncertain.

But she said there may be "an increasing number of these actions" in the coming years with the advancement of artificial intelligence, where "the integrity of one's work might be tempered with with greater ease".