🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials demands measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about industry interference with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, international health experts raised concerns that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the company recommends this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, delayed for at least 12 months after the legislation is approved.

The WHO actually suggests a warning should cover at least half of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the managing director of the African subsidiary states the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We live in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and collect the yield and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative stated: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Moreover, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The company was “not against rules”, they said, mentioning that underage people should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to achieve intended public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, adding that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which encompasses increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.